The lack of such basic business led operations as this leads me to question how the authors are managing to use the tool. And that there are branches, used as branches under the folder named branches. Manage messages? CollabNet is a registered trademark of CollabNet, Inc. http://lanprolab.net/an-internal/an-internal-error-has-occurred-java-lang-nullpointerexception.php
themaze75 Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ [Issue 1564] Cannot compare to branch/tag (Initializing Compare Editor for Compare) If you can come up with a reproduction recipe, let us know. Stephen ------------------------------------------------------ http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2353859To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[hidden email]]. Google Plugin for Eclipse 4.2 3.1.3.v201212122042-rel-r42 com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.e42.feature.feature.group Google, Inc.
share|improve this answer edited Jul 29 '13 at 15:47 answered Jul 29 '13 at 13:42 Mark Phippard 8,22512234 I have a prebuilt eclipse and little room for modifying it. I can find no way to ignore this property during the merge process, and it effectively makes merging useless. Now I understood. I am in the branch workspace, and do a team/merge.
And that there are branches, used as branches under the folder named branches. I just select all the projects in my workspace, right click and choose the merge option when I do it. Any suggestions to allow me to perform this simple task (merge selected files from TRUNK to branch) are welcome, although I'm not holding out much hope of ever being able to Well, CVS manages to show folder differences in the compare with view such that you can select them and copy the folders and files from left to right and vice versa.
I don't understand why you say they would need to be fully syched before doing this. Finally, Subclipse does have a feature like you asked. Just guessing. > My fifth issue is with attempting to use the alternative Compare With option to bring files from TRUNK to the Branch. Again, this makes merge pretty unusable. > > My fifth issue is with attempting to use the alternative Compare With option to bring files from TRUNK to the Branch. > No
I > got back the correctly filtered list of revisions after the revision I indicated was merged. http://tigris-scm.10930.n7.nabble.com/NullPointerException-during-merge-with-1-4-snapshot-td68500.html Given that the merge is unusable, maybe you might consider revisiting the Compare With view? > Subversion is not CVS. the svnmerge property is ignored when multiple projects are selected) This process of finding all the revisions takes about 5-10 minutes just for 2 eclipse projects, and I'm guessing it will However, svn is now a mainstream corporate tool used by point and click developers in very standard patterns.
Selective merging from trunk to branch should be a basic graphical scm operation. news I have just submitted the bug: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=459489 > > When do you think does the fix comes with an update? Mark Phippard-3 Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Branch merge issues On Wed, svn rv ~50,000. > > I have used the svn merge --record-only option to block the old changes prior to the cvs to svn migration. > > That has helped, as
Not sure. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/------------------------------------------------------ http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2355849To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[hidden email]]. Sometimes the windows explorer restarts as well and I get strange graphic issues. the svnmerge property is ignored when multiple projects are selected) > > This process of finding all the revisions takes about 5-10 minutes just for 2 eclipse projects, and I'm guessing have a peek at these guys But this feature is also set once, and by a user.
But why is it so hidden? The "classic" setup exists to make the URL's easy to manage and tools like TortoiseSVN and Subclipse that remember your URL's make it even easier. You just described the structure of every project I've ever worked on. Not only is merge not unusable, I think it works great. I've neverhad a problem doing this, even before merge
All I can suggest is you get rid of those properties. You will have properties at both levels, but SVN handles this in terms of applying it with merge tracking. There is no such thing as "trunk" in Subversion. And i don't know how to get the stacktrace of this exception –Maxime ARNSTAMM Jul 29 '13 at 14:38 Well, 1.8.19 is not as bad, so that is good.
Subclipse makes no effort to understand that the head of TRUNK and the head of the branch are the elements that are important. What is going on grammatically with "Xを嫌いになる"? Alexander Kitaev, TMate Software, http://tmate.org/ http://jetbrains.com/tmate/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 1:10 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Mark Phippard Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] empty error message for Branch/Tag http://lanprolab.net/an-internal/an-internal-error-has-occurred-java-lang-nullpointerexception-aptana.php Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
Then users could pick from the names in every location where a URL is currently used. Workshop | Twitter | LinkedIn | about.me Back to top Back to General 0 user(s) are reading this topic 0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users Reply to quoted postsClear However, I've mostly > worked with branches that I created post merge tracking. When merging multiple projects, it'd look at the parent folder to see what was eligible to merge.
Here is an example that shows the eligible revs from the Subclipse trunk that can be merged to the Subclipse 1.4.x branch. $ svn mergeinfo --show-revs=eligible http://subclipse.tigris.org/svn/subclipse/trunk/[email protected]://subclipse.tigris.org/svn/subclipse/branches/1.4.x/[email protected] runs the same API Again, this makes merge pretty unusable. >> >> You just described the structure of every project I've ever worked on. >> Not only is merge not unusable, I think it works With CVS, performing a merge will provide a dialog that allows the user to pick and choose which files to merge back. >> That is how the svn merge command works I'm happy to not have any svn merge features for versions before my MAXREV).
Thats crazy. Atlassian recommends upgrading to the latest release for a proper fix. Back to the top Jump to content Sign In Create Account Search Advanced Search section: This topic ForumsMembersHelp Files Calendar Knowledge Base Documentation Website View New Content Perforce.com Forums What I'm arguing for is for the svn toolset (as a whole) to recognise that shift.
Would i still see the branch/tag in the history view? What I'm arguing for is for the svn toolset (as a whole) to recognise that shift. Can you try the same diff from the command line: svn diff --summarize --depth=infinity